Search for: "People v High"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
This was from a survey that didn’t ask about law; it just asked about people’s problems. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
I don’t think high probability is ordinarily part of the definition of a credible threat. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:37 pm
The recent City of Ontario v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
”[8]Because of this high burden of proof, the ICJ did not find the required existence of specific intent in either of the two previous cases alleging genocide that reached the merits. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
Barnes v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
In Minersville School District v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 8:16 am
Madison (1803) and Dred Scott v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:14 am
And here is a local story, which includes a lawyerly tale of how people agree on who gets the privilege of arguing to the high Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:59 am
State v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:55 am
In that case, the prosecutor and defendant negotiated a plea agreement that was not predicated upon a statement by the Court that it would sentence defendant to a specified term or within a specified range, see People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 276 (1993). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 3:28 am
Contents include: V. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
David Dubin worked for his father’s company providing mental-health testing to young people at emergency shelters. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:08 am
Seljak v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
Except, like all high courts which exercised discretionary jurisdiction, when it wants to, and it did here. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm
Casey, the 1992 case that (mostly) reaffirmed Roe v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 4:42 pm
I even watch DVDs, on those rare occasions, on my computer screen (I'm in the tiny group referred to by David Pogue who are unmoved by an Apple TV or similar, as I don't have a computer v TV / work v leisure divide). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:34 am
Hughes)V. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
ICWA is not the exercise of federal control over Native peoples; it is an exercise of federal power over states and U.S. citizens for the benefit of tribes and Native peoples. [read post]
