Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 4041 - 4060 of 15,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2025, 3:18 am by INFORRM
The controversial powers would allow financial surveillance without suspicion and extend to both fraudulent and erroneous overpayments. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:19 am by Nassiri Law
First, it is undermining the state’s power to regulate affairs within state borders, which is something many people are trying to change. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Jackson frames the issues slightly differently: In 1913, the People's representatives responded, using their power to overturn Pollock via constitutional amendment. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
The Tenth Amendment provides that “powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Despite Truman’s argument that his position as commander-in-chief afforded him the power to make all military decisions, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled 6-3 in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 Why should they be expected to make a decision about taking a deposition until they know what the people are going to say? [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:52 am by Georgina Messenger, Three New Square IP
Secondly, the court appeared to demonstrate a fundamental reluctance to exercise its power to change the law. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Another peculiarity is what happened during oral argument in Hamdan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
  The Court starts with Article 40.3.3 of the Irish Constitution, inserted into the Constitution by an amendment passed by the majority of the Irish people in a referendum, and interpreted by the Irish Supreme Court in AG v. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 5:59 am by Joshua Andresen
Those familiar with the caselaw in this area will know that the Supreme Court held in Holder v. [read post]