Search for: "President v. State"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 22,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:59 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 7:13 am
Ridley Park Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 11:34 am
He was appointed to the United States District Court for the District of Oregon by President Obama in 2012. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:05 am
By its plain language, §1182(f) grants the President broad discretion to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Title: Strickland v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:07 pm
Unlike Summers v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:38 pm
As state lawmakers react to the changing landscape to enact state NIL laws, NCAA President Dr. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:34 pm
Trump for President v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Texas, as well, to the states. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
Lucia Companies, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:52 am
Elizabeth Magill starts as President this summer (Penn Today). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:50 am
The case is Presidio Components v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:56 am
The attorneys cited Packingham v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:22 am
"Tomorrow, the Mannheim Regional Court will hold a preliminary injunction hearing in a DivX v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:20 am
The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) has apparently filed a class action suit against Perdue Farms: The Humane Society of the United States announced the filing of a class action lawsuit against the nation’s third-largest poultry producer, Perdue Farms, over the company’s alleged false advertising of factory farmed chicken products as “humane. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
., Senior United States District Court Judge of the Northern District of New York, enjoined and restrained the four Presiding Justices of the New York State Appellate Divisions from enforcing large chunks of the attorney-advertising restrictions that had been recently promulgated.While Judge Scullin found that the Justices had a "substantial interest to ensure that attorney advertisements are not misleading," they failed to show… [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
We also do not think that Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
