Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Thus Congress can at a minimum require everyone either (i) to maintain insurance for goods or services that virtually everyone will consume, that the government guarantees, and that many of the consumers will not otherwise be able to pay for (which would thereby shift substantial costs to the public at large); or (ii) to make a modest payment to the government (IRS) to help cover the costs the public will incur if and when the individual consumes services for… [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Luminant Generating Co., LLC, v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
State, supra. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the well-publicized Assn. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
He co-directs the Immigration Law Clinic at UNLV. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Pickman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
The Defendant pleaded justification, and in mid-2010, applied that an order for service out of the jurisdiction be set aside on the grounds, derived from Jameel (Youssef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc. [2005] QB 946, that the Tweet did not constitute a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:12 am
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:21 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm
" Passaic Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
” Brief of Petitioner at 19, Al Bahlul v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm
The coercion argument can be traced initially to a comment the Supreme Court made in a 1937 decision, Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
In Dickerson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
Taking time to make changes needed to identify and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
And in Southern Union Co. v. [read post]
