Search for: "Richard v. United States" Results 4041 - 4060 of 4,452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:35 pm
Elken, Rethinking the Material Adverse Change Clause in Merger and Acquisition Agreements: Should the United States Consider the British Model? [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:08 pm
Following up on the Ontario Superior Court's recent decision on parental alienation in A.G.L. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
  The case concerns the President’s authority to detain individuals lawfully within the United States without trial on suspicion of conspiracy to engage in terrorism. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:14 pm
Federal Appellate Review post-Rita v United States Sherod Thaxton Book Reviews The Structure of Classical Public Law The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought Duncan Kennedy Barry Cushman Some Realism about Mass Torts Mass Torts in a World of Settlement Richard A. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit filed an opinion, in United Health Group Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:31 am
Although bogus account statements generated to lull defrauded investors are not in and of themselves sufficient to establish a securities fraud violation, because they are not statements made "in connection with the purchase or sale of any security," they are relevant evidence of the defendant's intent to defraud and the extent of the scheme employed, the Second Circuit held yesterday in a short decision in United States v. [read post]