Search for: "Rolling v. State"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 4,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2009, 7:54 am
See Rolling v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm
Severance had not pursued just compensation in Texas state courts, and the court held her claim was not ripe under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
City of New York, 5 N.Y.3d 731 (2005)(a dolly that rolls off a ledge and strikes a worker is the type of falling object risk that the statute protects against). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 17, 2009)Affirming JV ($10K wages; $20K comps; $220K atty fees) for fired rental car company station manager on her sex harass-based retaliation/discharge state law claims; but reducing punitive damages award from $500K to $120K)Commentary on previously reported Federal Appellate Court decisions> 3rd Cir.o o No need to accommodate shorter commuteParker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
If last week's Gant opinion -- which substantially rolled back the damage inflicted by New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
With the government putting its foot down on Lynch, LegalPad's eyes turn to a case in San Jose federal court, Santa Cruz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:59 pm
(The case is Video Game Dealers Association v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm
(Side note: it was ridiculously exciting, as a recent escapee from south Florida, to go to an event in another state and be able to drive there in less than six hours.)Aside from transcription, formatting, and adding some links, these notes are presented as I took them - i.e., uncleaned up, sometimes random or unclear, and I've probably gotten a few things wrong or otherwise misrepresented them. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:26 am
Yes, word is that the first major band to use file-sharing as a business model1 has agreed to step up on behalf of the defense in the whole Sony (et al) v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:19 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Whether one is happy with the state of intellectual property law or not, it seems to have worked as advertised in this case. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
That changed yesterday.The Supreme Court issued it's decision in Rivera v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
He rolled his eyes. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:30 pm
The question of whether to roll back federal pre-emption has simmered since last year’s Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
The question of whether to roll back federal pre-emption has simmered since last year’s Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
" Lovret v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
" Haven't they heard of United States v. [read post]
