Search for: "Samsung"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 6,709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2012, 6:00 pm
On Friday the ITC filed a redacted version of a remedy suggested by ITC Administrative Law Judge Thomas Pender, in which he recommended a ban be enforced against Samsung products that were found to infringe upon four Apple patents. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 6:30 am
Related posts:Apple vs Samsung: The Smartphone Patent War ContinuesWhy is this fight so important? [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 2:49 am
Reexaminations are another opportunity for Samsung. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
There really is a lot of money at stake in Apple-Samsung: if Samsung could solve the whole Apple patent problem by paying a billion dollars, it would do so any day of the week. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:38 pm
To some extent, that's just normal, and Samsung has the resources and the sophistication to deal with this. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 5:00 pm
It would also be the largest patent verdict in history, beating out this summer's $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung for infringing patents and trademarks owned by Apple. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 12:06 pm
Samsung's infringement allegations are LTE-based and the complaint makes reference to Samsung's ETSI (European Telecommunication Standards Institute) disclosures. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 10:16 am
In the Samsung case the European Commission is demonstrating world-class regulatory leadership: last week it issued a Statement of Objections. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:20 am
And I don't believe Samsung thinks so either. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:31 am
Samsung also argues that Mr. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am
In the Samsung-Apple saga, the EU is probing whether Samsung violated agreements to license key patents to other mobile-phone manufacturers on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, known as FRAND. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:05 am
This certainly adds a more strategic dimension to the Ericsson-Samsung dispute. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 4:35 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 695 F.3d 1370, 1374 (Fed. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:11 am
Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 5:07 pm
Though the court agreed that Apple had suffered irreparable harm, the failure to attribute these to Samsung’s conduct decided this in Samsung’s favour. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:48 pm
It will most likely expire before Samsung would (if ever) win an injunction over it, but again, it's a positive thing that Samsung increasingly relies on non-SEPs. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 10:26 am
This means we're past the stage of Samsung merely being suspected of abuse of a dominant market position (this theory is not based on Samsung's smartphone market share but on the leverage that SEPs give their owners), but that the Commission has preliminarily determined, after almost a year of formal investigations (which followed several months of preliminary ones), that Samsung has indeed committed abuse and should be sanctioned. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:18 am
A couple of injunctions that Samsung won in Korea are currently stayed (for the duration of the appeals). [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:39 am
Samsung matters, the appeals of the preliminary injunctions against the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the Galaxy Nexus.Apple's letter notes that "a jury found Samsung willfully infringed six Apple patents and diluted Apple's trade dress", but "the district court denied a permanent injunction, relying on the 'causal nexus' requirement announced in [the two aforementioned preliminary injunction appeals]". [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 2:36 am
The targeted claims -- 29, 30, and 33-35 -- are exactly the ones that an ITC judge recently found Samsung to infringe (that same preliminary ruling, which the ITC staff supports, also held Samsung to infringe the "Steve Jobs" patent, a hardware patent, and a design patent).Apple also attempted to assert the RE'922 patent against HTC in Delaware. [read post]
