Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 4041 - 4060 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 12:09 pm by Federal and Extradition Defense
Practitioners abroad might find of interest this new development in US search and seizure jurisprudence  to the extent that US mail seized without a warrant is proffered as evidence in a criminal prosecution in other jurisdictions. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:40 am by Alain Leibman
Even if the warrant did not authorize the seizure of child pornography, the “plain view” exception controlled. [read post]
Earlier this year, after receiving briefing from the ACLU and other organizations (ACLU of Pennsylvania, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy and Technology), the court of appeals in Philadelphia held that although the government can obtain this information on a less-than-probable-cause standard in many cases, judges have the discretion to require a warrant, particularly where such information threatens to violate individuals' Fourth Amendment right to be free… [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:32 am by SHG
 The challenge of adopting historic search and seizure jurisprudence to new technology can't be left to hit and miss analogy. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:25 pm by Doug
Police must obtain search warrants before perusing Internet users’ e-mail records, a federal appeals court ruled in a landmark decision that struck down part of a 1986 law allowing warrantless access. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
That should be that, but instead the Geiter court engages in an exhaustive discussion of various doctrines of search and seizure law, and comes ominously close to pronouncing that there’s a good faith exception for warrantless searches. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
The residual privacy expectation Weaver retained in his vehicle, while perhaps small, was at least adequate to support his claim of a violation of his constitutional right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.2. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:18 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Search and Seizure Automobile exception; collective knowledge Officers may search an automobile without a warrant although they did not have probable cause, based on the collective knowledge of other officers investigating the suspects. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:24 am by Rob McKinney
                                   Felix Booker had a body cavity search that tests the limits of search and seizure law. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 pm
The Fourth Amendment protects the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:47 pm
They police may have exceeded their Constitutional bounds and violated your Right to be Free from Unlawful Searches and Seizures. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:52 pm by Andrew Dat
Unlawful in this context means that if it’s done without a valid warrant, then the search or seizure violates our constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:20 am
That did not make seizure of the drugs invalid because they would have been found in plain view during the execution of the warrant. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
A cell phone used for text messaging an undercover officer was subject to search upon its seizure at the time of defendant's drug arrest.There obviously was probable cause for searching it. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:24 pm by Jim Jenkins
For published articles on other Search and Seizure issues in Florida see web site of M. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
Government agents act in flagrant disregard of a warrant justifying “wholesale suppression … only when (1) they effect a widespread seizure of items that were not within the scope of the warrant, and (2) do not act in good faith. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 11:12 am by Jonathan Bailey
Unless you’re doing something, such as running a file download or a bittorrent site, that earns the attention of those major rightsholders and does so at a level that warrants the attention of the government, you probably aren’t in danger of being seized. [read post]