Search for: "See v. See" Results 4041 - 4060 of 122,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2023, 5:42 pm
—--------Para suscribir este manifiesto escriba su nombre en este enlace - Fecha límite 11 de noviembre de 2023El manifiesto se publicará y se enviará a representantes del Gobierno de España y miembros del Parlamento Europeo—--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------MANIFESTO EMBARGOED UNTIL 11 NOVEMBER 2023 To subscribe to this manifesto enter your name in this link -… [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
In other words, it excludes certain conduct from the scope of protection afforded by Convention rights and thus prevents individuals from invoking the Convention in defence of such actions (see also Perinçek v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs’ contention that they could present such proof at trial is unavailing (see Di Sabato v Soffes, 9 AD2d 297, 301 [1st Dept 1959], app dismissed 11 AD2d 660 [1st Dept 1960]). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC enforces the GLBA with respect to non-bank financial institutions such as mortgage brokers, money transmitters, payday lenders, automotive dealerships, retailers that directly issue consumer credit cards, and tax preparers.[3] The FTC promulgated the Safeguards Rule in 2002 under Subtitle A of Title V of the GLBA, which directs the FTC and other federal financial regulators to establish standards relating to administrative, technical and physical safeguards for certain… [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm by Ronald Mann
Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
[iv] Flawed Best Value Analyses In addition to overturning best value decisions based on flawed technical evaluations[v], GAO also reaffirmed its view that a Source Selection Authority’s (“SSA’s”) reliance solely on adjectival ratings without consideration of lower rated but acceptable proposals, with lower relative prices, was improper. [read post]