Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 6,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
Glenn Cameron, Susan Hutton and Lisa McDowell - Despite uncertainty and slow growth in the US and Europe, Canada has continued, for the most part, to post impressive economic results. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:09 am
" Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:01 am
In Polestar Maritime Ltd v YHM Shipping Co Ltd (The Rewa), the buyer of a vessel appealed against a decision that it had not been entitled to cancel a MOA and was liable in damages for breach of contract for refusing to complete the transaction. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
., LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:13 pm
The decision is Coffee.org, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:26 pm
In Creed Spann v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm
A settlement order, reached as part of the FTC’s ongoing efforts to stamp out online marketing fraud, permanently bans Jesse Willms and his companies from using ‘negative-option’ marketing, a practice in which the seller interprets consumers’ silence or inaction as permission to charge them. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
A settlement order, reached as part of the FTC’s ongoing efforts to stamp out online marketing fraud, permanently bans Jesse Willms and his companies from using ‘negative-option’ marketing, a practice in which the seller interprets consumers’ silence or inaction as permission to charge them. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:30 pm
In particular, the company relied on Quill v North Dakota (1992) and said that there was no tax nexus that would be recognized under US Supreme Court jurisprudence on the matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm
In a recent decision, Triple R Development, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:46 am
In his recent February 8, 2012 decision in the case of Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:07 am
In Gravers v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
., L.P. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
., L.P. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 4:25 am
" A 1988 Brooklyn larceny case involving the theft of a television, People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
SPSL OPOBO Liberia, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
Aitken v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:51 am
In theory, an Indian court can order a buyout of dissenting shareholders under section 394(1)(v) of the Companies Act, but I am not aware of such discretion having been exercised in practice, at least not in any of the high-profile schemes of arrangement.3. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:00 pm
The petition of the day is: McCall v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:22 pm
Milliken v. [read post]
