Search for: "State, in Interest of Jr" Results 4041 - 4060 of 5,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 10:22 am by Big Tent Democrat
Biden Jr. because of an impasse over the role of taxes in any final deal. ? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:18 pm by Dan Ernst
Although many book-length studies of individual courts have been written–see Edward A.Purcell, Jr. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:53 am by Jenna Greene
Securities and Exchange Commission, state regulators, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 14 of the Treaty permits the requested state to temporarily surrender for proceedings in the requesting state a person who is being proceeded against or is serving a sentence in the requested state. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Steve Hall
The country’s interests are not served by violating international law — as happened in the case of death row inmate Humberto Leal Jr. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am by Steve Hall
The death penalty case against Humberto Leal García Jr. did not seem like the sort to draw attention from a high-profile list of former U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:46 am by ninapaley
A law student at Arizona State University investigated this claim and agreed. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:30 am by azatty
State Bar President Alan Bayham Jr., left, receives a gift from incoming President Joe Kanefield, June 14, 2011, Tucson Follow @azatty [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:58 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
It turns out that in the state of New York, since 1965, sales taxes are imposed on the fees paid by patrons at strip clubs. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Kara OBrien
Parsons, Jr. of the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held the heightened standard of review under Revlon applied to a merger where shareholders were to receive 50 percent cash and 50 percent stock for their shares. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am by kylew
  Thus, the majority held that Stanford interpreted the Bayh-Dole Act too broadly, stating that “nowhere in the Act are inventors deprived of their interest in federally funded inventions. [read post]