Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 4041 - 4060 of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
” On Tuesday, Wells highlighted opinions from the federal District of Oregon in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  On the individual rights side, the Guarantee Clause implicitly grants United States citizens who are residents of states the right to vote for state legislative offices. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:28 pm by Peter Margulies
For example, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
Among other cases, the Supreme Courtandrsquo;s majority opinion cited the 1987 case Shearson/American Express Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
4) ISPs should bear implementation costs ... and may think of preventative filtering as a cheaper solutionSimilarly to what stated in his earlier judgment in 20C Fox v BT (No 2), Arnold J took the view that "the rightholders should pay the costs of an unopposed application ... [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
| Retromark Volume III: the last six months in trade marks | An IPSOC Q&A with Mr Justice Birss | The EU Commission proposes new whistle-blowing rules: should IP and trade secret holders tremble? [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
 In this regard, Hadley v Kemp is not an isolated instance (see Rockford Map Publishers at 148-9; Miller v Civil City of South Bend at 1093-5; Garcia v Google at 742-3). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
 The Copyright Act explicitly states that works of artistic craftsmanship are protected as artistic works. [read post]