Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2014, 9:02 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
The same provision further states that the ISP’s knowledge is to be presumed only when an infringement notice sent by the right holder includes certain detailed information like “the specific localisation of the contested content” -- that is to say, the URL of the allegedly infringing content. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 am
Chen v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
H.B. 232 does not apply to any person or entity subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, any person or entity subject to HIPAA, or any Kentucky agencies, local governments, or political subdivisions. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:43 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has taken on two high-profile intellectual property cases, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Until 2009, each unit-holder nominated one director to the four-member board. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 1:27 pm
Products v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 7:09 am
Barger v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 7:02 am
The law excludes persons and entities that are subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:27 am
The Department admitted most of this mismanagement before the first trial in Cobell, conceding that it "does not adequately control the receipts and disbursements of all [trust] account holders," that it "does not provide all account holders with periodic statements of their account performance," that it "does not provide adequate staffing, supervision, and training for all aspects of trust fund management and… [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
Homesteads apply to “homes” owned by sole owners, joint tenants, tenants by the entirety, tenant in common, life estate holders, and the holders of beneficial interests in a real estate trust holding title to a residence. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:45 am
This morning the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-435/12 ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie, Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 12:24 pm
Today the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its ruling in Case C‑583/12 Sintax [or, if you prefer, Syntax: the CJEU uses both spellings] Trading OÜ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Põhja maksu- ja tollikeskus, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Estonia's Riigikohus. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:53 am
Holder decision and the need for Congress to recognize an affirmative right to vote. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:28 am
Holder and Arizona... [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
RUTAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:08 pm
Essentially, the State argues that the target of MoveOn.org’s parody (Governor Jindal) is not the holder or owner of the mark (the State). [read post]
