Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 4041 - 4060
of 29,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland, TV Vest v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm
--Court: Court of Appeals of Colorado, Division OneOpinion Date: 6/11/09Cite: Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
State of Md., 935 F.Supp. 659, 664 (D.Md.1996). [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
It is in fact a mantra of EU law that one of the duties of the Community legislature itself is to ensure “a high level of health protection”; see the ruling by the ECJ and the Opinion of Advocate General Geelhoed in case C-491/01 R v Secretary of State ex parte BAT and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453 at paragraphs 119-121 and 229-230. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
Almost a decade on, there are still very few cases that interpret those state-level changes as differing in any meaningful way from the federal standards. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
In June the United States Supreme Court struck down the federal law commonly known as the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in US v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:45 am
Bradley Hester originally brought the case Hester v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:07 am
See Hurley v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:09 pm
” [at [205]] PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52 (19 April 2011) Related posts:Canadian Case on State Immunity In Kazemi (Estate of) v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:30 pm
Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.comOn June 30, 2020, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg in “United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Nothing resembling this mass consolidation has been seen on the federal level in some twenty years since appellate courts stepped in and called a halt to jumbo asbestos consolidations in Cimino v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court issued an order relating to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the case of Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:40 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 11:49 am
Our Los Angeles marijuana DUI lawyers are concerned for the kind of precedent this sets, and although the ultimate outcome will only have an immediate effect in Arizona, there is no doubt that prosecutors and lawmakers in other states - particularly those in which marijuana is legal for either medicinal or recreational purposes - will be closely watching the outcome of Arizona v. [read post]
