Search for: "State v. Little"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 23,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2020, 1:30 pm
He first entered the United States without inspection in or around 2008, and shortly thereafter met U.S. citizen Flora Rico. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:50 pm
King stated that Hernandez presented "a very difficult diagnostic dilemma in that he does not appear to make any effort to cooperate with requests for left upper extremity use activities. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm
As Justice Bedsworth says, yes, offering him five years if he pleads guilty does make sure he goes to prison, and saves us a little bit of money in prosecution costs, but "[a]ny expense saved the state by his plea would likely be re-incurred with interest if he gets out in five years and there are still bus stops. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 10:25 am
By Jake McGowan Masck v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:14 am
New York State Court of Claims: DePaula v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:08 am
Here are the materials in Two Shields v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
United States, 11-6602; Cox v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 1:26 pm
The post Lackey v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
According to Justice Alito, “We have long recognized that the Constitution restricts a State’s power to reach out and regulate conduct that has little if any connection with the State’s legitimate interests. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:47 pm
Supreme Court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari in Hagan v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 7:09 pm
" If this ruling gets legs, it could result in a little less pain for the poor folks who foolishly bet on Mizzou v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
In Teague v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
Robbie v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:33 am
The condition was that he be given leave to appeal the district court's denial of his motion to suppress the evidence seized from his car by a Wyoming State Trooper.Propriety of the Search and Seizure: In Speten v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
