Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2007, 12:15 pm
A Golfer has No Duty to Protect Another Player From Ordinary NegligenceShin v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:02 pm
As can hardly be contested, the State also has a strong interest in ensuring that our youth are educated such that they can become more productive members of our society. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Article V not only imposes supermajority requirements but imposes them at two levels – Congress and state legislatures (or conventions) – both of which must be satisfied. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:48 pm
The Facts of the Case In the case of Rayner v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
There exists, however, a strong presumption against federal preemption of state and local legislation, particularly when that legislation regulates matters related to health and safety. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:34 am
The Seventh Circuit "has outlined a clearly established 'substantial' right in the confidentiality of medical information that can only be overcome by a sufficiently strong state interest. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:29 pm
” Mussat v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
United States (2012), to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 2:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 9:51 am
In a 6-1 decision published today, the Ohio Supreme Court, in Leininger v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 6:06 am
In Fosler v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:30 pm
(David Kopel) McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
In Metzler Investment GMBH v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:07 am
Sheen would have a strong contract claim against Warner if the contract contains a “pay-or-play clause. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:57 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
