Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 4041 - 4060 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2010, 12:22 pm by Morris Turek
  Unquestionably, BLIZZARD is an arbitrary and famous trademark entitled to the broadest scope of protection under U.S. trademark law. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
  Not surprisingly, risk of liability will go up if you don’t do them. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:30 pm by Venkat
This case is somewhat reminiscent of another case involving the application of a consumer protection statute to changing internet merchant practices: Powers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:53 pm
Consume only pasteurized dairy products. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(My thoughts: The fact that artists don’t shut up doesn’t mean that the situation has improved/not deteriorated. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:46 pm
Cir. 2009) ("The claims, not specification embodiments, define the scope of patent protection. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As long as people are consuming work as she conceived it, doesn’t matter how people are perceiving it—in person, by projector, etc. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:56 am
"The Court came out with its ruling on 16 July 2009, tidying the questions up by providing just two answers: "1. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The total count for posts on the LexBlog Network today hits 134 and, while that probably doesn't crack the top 10 all time, this is one of the stronger round-ups quantity-wise that I've seen in awhile. [read post]