Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 4041 - 4060 of 4,352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development  of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Once price becomes a material part of a client's selection criteria, unfortunately, firms have put one foot on an escalator that goes in only one direction. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:22 am
First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES S5457 THOMPSON -- Relates to the penalty for violating certain provisions requiring a stop at a railroad crossing Same as A 6300 BLURB : V & T L. penalty rr crossing First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION S5458 THOMPSON -- Makes causing physical injury to a… [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:20 am
Here is somelanguage from the decision, North Carolina v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:40 am by Dan E. Stigall
This could be done in a more obvious manner, such as adjusting the proportion in the selling price of the immoveable upwards or downwards. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Above this benchmark is the Controlling Interest Basis representing pricing as if the entire company (or a controlling interest in it) is sold. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:26 am
Rosa DeLauro and Diana DeGette Letter requests the President to use the Strategic Economic Dialogue between the U.S and China as an opportunity to reach an agreement on food imports that establishes genuine transparency and equivalent food safety regulations between both countries 05/23/2007 Letter to the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health from the California Medical Association (PDF 117 KB) Letter supports elimination of the Medicare Advantage Private… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm by WIMS
  EPA needs to explain to the American people why it blatantly circumvented its own procedures to make what appears to be a predetermined endangerment finding. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
It is quite a price for pay for falling foul of the Editors (moral) Code for those in the public eye. 2. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
  Maybe… The age of drugs / Dalrymple (Illus. in: Puck, v. 48, no. 1231 (1900 October 10), centerfold). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by admin
DON’T send those people to Barstow!!! [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:03 pm by Robert E. Connolly
  In that sense, it is the government that lacks mutuality; it can indict with a reasonable assurance—[but certainly not a guarantee]—that the defendant will not be able/willing to pay the stiff price of appearing in the U.S. to challenge the indictment. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
However, that success has come at a price. [read post]