Search for: "US v. George" Results 4041 - 4060 of 6,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2012, 7:19 am by Damien Geradin
In Section V, we attempt to determine whether industrial policy should take priority over competition policy in the area of merger control in light of these developments. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
  In the 4th Circuit, the multifactor test set out in George & Co, LLC v Imagination Entm’t Ltd (2009) lists the factors as follows: 1. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
In 2000, the court was again in the spotlight, deciding the presidential election in favor of Republican George W. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:05 am by Mark Methenitis
Using means that highlight the unsavory uses of useful technology is not a solution. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
It states in pertinent part: “A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012 (in defense of person), s. 776.013 (home protection), s. 776.031 (in defense of others) is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer…” In 2010, in Dennis v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by Jeff Gamso
  But really there's nothing much to add about the Trayvon Marting/George Zimmerman affair. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:24 am by Orin Kerr
A taste: As policies, Obamacare and George W. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Under a duty to retreat, D must leave V’s presence, or else if he stays he will be subject to V’s potentially deadly attack (or at least seriously injurious attack) without any legal right to use potentially deadly force in self-defense. [read post]