Search for: "United States v. Fields" Results 4041 - 4060 of 5,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm by Felicia Boyd (US)
Opposer also introduced empirical evidence that a substantial portion of the United States is aware of the SPOTIFY mark. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 1:04 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Last January, the United States Supreme Court decided in Missouri v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
  Indeed, in comments proffered on the release of the State Council White Paper Tian Peiyan, the deputy director of the Communist Party's Policy Research Office took great pains to contrast the Chinese path of democratic constitutionalism with that advanced by the United States and its larger camp. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 25, 2008 United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:48 am
But what began as a discussion about specific sexual harassment opinions seemed to transform into a debate over the state of feminism in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:48 pm by Jon Ibanez
Three years later in the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 8:23 pm
On the other side of the fence, In Kitzmiller v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
This is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:30 am by Sotiris Paphitis
Specifically, concerning Article 4(2)(b), the protection against disclosing a journalist’s sources had already been considered an essential component of the journalist’s freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR (Goodwin v United Kingdom). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:52 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Practice Center Contributor) The United States Patent and Trademark Office has provided an update to its Examination Guidelines concerning the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 in light of precedential decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued since the 2007 decision by the United States Supreme Court in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]