Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 10,390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
Kozak et al – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – March 7th, 2017) involves the trademarks for the words LIFEGUARD and LIFE GUARD. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
The United States Embassy in Libya suspended its operations in 2014. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then continued to assess the evidence, and concluded that the shape of the KitKat chocolate bar had acquired distinctive character through use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, but that the Board of Appeal could not validly conclude its examination of the distinctive character acquired by the contested trade mark throughout the European Union on the basis of the percentage of the public recognising… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:32 am
United States, No. 16-5454, Justice Thomas issued a dissent from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
A group of 50 organisations and nearly 90 individual experts have signed a statement against the US Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) proposal to ask non-citizens to provide the passwords to their social media accounts in order to enter the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 11:30 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
To prevail on a likelihood of confusion claim brought under Trademark Act Section 2(d), a party must first prove that: it owns “a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States …and not abandoned…. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
To prevail on a likelihood of confusion claim brought under Trademark Act Section 2(d), a party must first prove that: it owns “a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States …and not abandoned…. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
On an operational level, and for most students of law in the United States, the study of the practices and approaches of judges is important for another reason. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:36 am
We, the jury from the United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
Instead, AbbVie stated that a late insufficiency objection had given rise to its decision. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:16 pm
Banning the use of confidential sources denies a core principle reflected in media ethics codes from around the world and flies in the face of the First Amendment to the United States constitution and rights to free speech. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
This decision comes after the English Courts had similarly refused the registration of the same Shape Marks in the United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:36 am
See Southeastern Promotions v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
United States, in which the justices will consider whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:35 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert priority rights over a mark that… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
United States The newest version of Melania Trump’s defamation claim she has filed against the Daily Mail leaves out a controversial portion of the original — a section that argued the first lady’s earning potential as a brand spokeswoman would be irretrievably damaged by the defamation. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 8:14 am
It read, in part: That the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized to issue, on the credit of the United States, one hundred and fifty millions of dollars of United States notes, not bearing interest, payable to bearer, at the Treasury of the United States, and of Denominations, such denominations as he may deem expedient, not less than five dollars each. [read post]
