Search for: "United States v. Paul" Results 4041 - 4060 of 4,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 12:32 am
Chung highlights Justice Field's dissent in Juilliard v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:56 am
  That wasn't enough for the State of Georgia. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:25 am by centerforartlaw
Mark Rothko (1903-1970) is a central figure in Abstract Expressionism, a movement that emerged in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
  Danielle Parr, Entertainment Software Association of Canada Anti-circumvention provisions, Canadian piracy of video games is disproportionate to the United States, TPMs used for more than preventing piracy. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am by Victoria Kwan
Shifting our review to the United States, Justice Sonia Sotomayor read the Declaration of Independence for Heritage Day at the Oysterponds Historical Society in Orient, New York. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:15 am
Laufer (The Wharton School), on Saturday, November 28, 2020 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court has held that Morrison v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense, observing that because “Dean seems to me to be a substantive ruling that applies retroactively,” there will likely “be many more than just a handful of ‘Dean resentencing’ efforts. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane shared the government’s response-and-reply brief in Klayman v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:58 am by Moria Miller
”DiPompeo ran the Law Review successfully, including publishing a comment, "Federal Hate Crime Laws and United States v. [read post]