Search for: "York v York" Results 4041 - 4060 of 52,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2018, 10:37 am by JAntonelli
If you’ve received a Strike 3 Holdings LLC subpoena: Click here to […] The post Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:01 am by Frank Marciano
The rules changed after the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its ruling in the 2017 case of Bisbing v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:25 am by Mitchell Boyarsky
The issue of whether a hospital system (operating over 25 facilities) and its Chief Executive Officer can be held liable for wage claims by workers employed at a single entity within the system was decided by the Eastern District of New York in Wolman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 8:21 am
There is, however, an analogous New Jersey statute, and recently a New York court considered its extraterritorial application in New York cases. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:08 am
Law office failure results in a default judgment against the NYC Teachers' Retirement SystemMatter of Rownd v Teachers' Retirement Sys. of the City of New York, 2008 NY Slip Op 05368, Decided on June 12, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentR. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 12:36 am
The following bills retrieved using the word search penal law were introduced in the New York State Legislature on December 13, 2006: Bill No.  A12120 Rules (Gantt) -- Relates to the crimes of vehicular assault and vehicular manslaughterSame as S 8518 RULES COMSUMM : Amd SS1192, 1198-a & 511, V & T L; amd SS70.00, 120.04 & 125.13, Pen L Relates to the crimes of vehicular assault and vehicular manslaughter. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:13 pm
Class Action Counsel Obtained Significant Benefit through Class Action Settlement Following 10-Year Litigation but Requested Multiplier was Excessive given Billing Rates of Class Counsel, Warranting Multiplier of 1.5 rather than 1.79 as Requested New York Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a class action in New York state court against his automobile insurance company following its payment of insurance benefits that allegedly “did not reflect the amount that plaintiff, the… [read post]