Search for: "v. Park" Results 4041 - 4060 of 17,541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2018, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In particular it considered what the correct approach is when the right is a right to recreation which is enjoyed in a self-contained way on the servient land, and the correctness of the decision in Re Ellenborough Park. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In particular it considered what the correct approach is when the right is a right to recreation which is enjoyed in a self-contained way on the servient land, with the correctness of the decision in Re Ellenborough Park also being in issue. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Richard Hunt
Garden Square Parking Assn., 2018 WL 4961597  (C.D. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 7:06 am
  Facts:  The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (the "Commission"), as part of Montgomery County, and URS Corporation ("URS") entered into an agreement for URS to provide the Commission with engineering services for the construction of the Rock Creek Hiker-Biker Trail Bridge over Veirs Mill Road. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” This blog’s analysis of Monday’s argument in Sturgeon v, Frost, in which the court considered whether the National Park Service can regulate activities on navigable waters within the national park system in Alaska, comes from Sandi Zellmer. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Judicial review of an administrative determination made after an adversarial hearing is limited Buccieri v County of Westchester, 2018 NY Slip Op 07305, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentA Westchester County employee [Petitioner] was served with disciplinary charges and specifications pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Judicial review of an administrative determination made after an adversarial hearing is limited Buccieri v County of Westchester, 2018 NY Slip Op 07305, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentA Westchester County employee [Petitioner] was served with disciplinary charges and specifications pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm by Sandi Zellmer
Given the statutory ambiguities, readers may wonder why the Park Service’s reading of ANILCA and its own enabling acts would not be entitled to deference from the Supreme Court under Chevron v. [read post]