Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 7,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
On Wednesday 20 July 2011, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R v Smith which was heard on 16 June 2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 7:24 am
The case involves “inter partes review,” a new procedure for dealing with dubious patents adopted in the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:00 am
Gordon Smith. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:50 am
If you have specific questions in this regard, the Reed Smith employment law team as the case may be together with our data protection colleagues will be happy to assist. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:30 am
Finally driven to respond in the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), Congress adopted a new procedure for dealing with dubious patents, “inter partes review. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:50 pm
Another case including appalling behaviour by the parties, summed up by this quote from HHJ Hayward Smith QC:"...each of them demonstrated deep animosity and total mistrust of the other. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:02 am
UK and Jane Smith v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:21 am
There are invariably two sides to any dispute -- and Merpel is happy to take on her adversaries Merpel has let off her head of steam concerning ICANN, and this has attracted the attention of World Trademark Review's Adam Smith. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:35 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:06 am
Application granted. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:38 am
The applicants were convicted by the Swedish Supreme Court for agitation against a national or ethnic group. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
* * * *As the Court explained in Lukumi, and as the SG himself acknowledges in his brief in Fulton, not all exceptions or anomalous applications foreclose a rule's "general applicability" for Free Exercise purposes. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Smith 13-946Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit failed to apply the deferential standard of review required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
His concurring opinion does not question, or even cite, Smith, Miller, or the third-party doctrine in any way. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
Smith: what about Mavrix? [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:30 am
In fact, according to FDA’s regulatory impact analysis of the rule, investigational use applications are expected to cost between $2.6 million and $10.3 million and a Premarket Application (PMA) is expected to cost about $4.4 million. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc., 62 F.3d 8, 13 (1st Cir. 1995); Herzog v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
Yet Smith sailed on. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:46 am
Adam Smith, chair of the House Armed Services Committee, about the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
• Complex priority scheme, which results in 16% of applicants being rejected because their priority status has changed by the time of the interview from original application. [read post]
