Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 4061 - 4080 of 14,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
But then there are two previous judgments on this issue, which the Upper Tribunal then turns to: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Nelson and Fife Council (2014) UKUT 525 (AAC) (our report here) and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Glasgow City Council and IB (2017) CSIH 35 (our report here). [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 10:05 am by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions v Carmichael & Anor (2018) EWCA Civ 548 The was the SoS appeal to the Court of Appeal of an Upper Tribunal decision (our note here). [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:15 am
  Thus, I was particularly amused to learn that my love of Latin is shared by The Onion which explained its Latin motto, tu stultus es, in an amicus brief filed yesterday with no less than the United States Supreme Court in Novak v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:02 am by Joshua Matz
Nixon was correct rather than deferring to the state court's interpretation under AEDPA and whether the state court's interpretation of Florida v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:26 am
Telling Miller's Tale (with Brannon Denning): A look at the 1939 case of United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:28 pm
Thanks to Robert Loblaw of the blog Decision of the Day for picking up on Judge Easterbrook's opinion today in the case out of the ND Illinois, Wade v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 5:53 am
A favorite reader alerted me to an unpublished sentencing opinion from the Tenth Circuit in US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:21 am by jonathanturley
There is a major ruling this week in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit where a three-judge panel ruled unanimously in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:47 am by Sherry F. Colb
Remember learning at oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm by PaulKostro
Innes, 117 N.J. 496, 518 (1990) (stating a settlement agreement should be enforced by a trial court only to the extent it is equitable and just); Miller v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, given the recent approach of the Canadian Court of Appeal in Paulsson v. [read post]