Search for: "Best v. State Bar"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 5,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:53 pm
The authors found that LSAT and GPA are only weakly predictive of first-time bar passage rates, and that performance in the first year of law school had far greater predictive value. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 7:56 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court decided to hear NCAA v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
” Stated otherwise, several decades ago, people debated whether it was proper law society business to investigate if lawyers, once called to the bar, could actually do their jobs properly. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Lemons v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 5:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Third, and most important, the statement seemingly identifies the argument that Justices Ginsburg and Breyer think has the best chance: “whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates’ allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway” or instead should be “withdrawn or modified. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
Idiosyncratic language, highly technical terms, or terms coined by the inventor are best understood by reference to the specification. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Couvillion, Note, Defending for its life: ChampionsWorld LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
If there were something substantively wrong with Canada’s Patent Act that makes it non-compliant with international law, it could have been challenged in a state to state procedure in the WTO. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
If there were something substantively wrong with Canada’s Patent Act that makes it non-compliant with international law, it could have been challenged in a state to state procedure in the WTO. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm
In Clinton v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 4:58 pm
(Ramsey v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
California is one of a handful of states to allow aspiring lawyers to take the bar exam without going to an ABA- accredited law school. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:32 am
See Alden v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm
In United States Trust Company of New York v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
