Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 11,181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding, are framing their arguments to “fight for Justice Kennedy’s vote. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 10:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in refusing last year to bar the state law from going into effect, did not apply that strong test. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
Many states, such as California, still have broad joint-employer tests under their respective wage-hour laws. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:21 am
After asking the lower court to send the record in the case – a sure sign that at least one justice is looking at the case closely — today the court granted review to decide whether the disclosures required by the California law violate the First Amendment’s free speech clause; it declined to decide whether the disclosures run afoul of another part of the First Amendment that bars the government from prohibiting the free exercise of religion. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 10:28 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 9:27 am
” He notes that while California courts do not always share this view, the trend there does seem to be heading in this direction. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 9:27 am
” He notes that while California courts do not always share this view, the trend there does seem to be heading in this direction. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:47 am
In 1993, an appellate court in California ruled in People vs. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:47 am
In 1993, an appellate court in California ruled in People vs. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:05 pm
Clerk’s biggest drawback is that it is exclusively built for California state law. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 12:56 pm
Paige Gasper, a 21-year-old student at Sonoma State University in California, has filed the first of what is likely to be many lawsuits relating to the mass shooting in Las Vegas on October 1. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am
Just last week, after undertaking an unusual “fast track” process requested by the Chief Judge of its Supreme Court, California became the 50th state to adopt ABA Ethical Rule 3.8 requiring prosecutors to turn over all favorable information that tends to negate the guilt of an accused, which will allow the state bar to discipline prosecutors who deliberately violate its terms. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Most courts have held that employers are not required to assist a disabled employee with getting to work. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 8:48 am
” And neither inmate in today’s cases, the court concluded, could clear that bar. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
The bar staff also warned the suspect not to drive. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 2:17 pm
Feinstein and Harris may be responding to the concerns of their California constituents, as Californians have a long history of supporting privacy and civil liberties In 2015, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which bars state and local government agencies from compelling companies to hand over digital communications, or otherwise acquiring such data, without first obtaining a warrant. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 9:50 am
According to court documents, William M. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm
California has the California Email Communications Privacy Act (Cal ECPA), the Student Online Personal Information Protection Act (SOPIPA), and California’s state constitution provides an affirmative right to privacy that has resulted in Comcast paying fines when it unlawfully disclosed customers’ personal information. [read post]
