Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 4061 - 4080 of 4,551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
United States, 24 F.2d 665, 666-67 (9th Cir.1928) (holding that Rule 41(d), now Rule 41(f)(1)(C), does not invariably require that the copy of the warrant and receipt be served before a search takes place). [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
Forcelux Ltd v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal from a decision by a Circuit judge on an appeal from a order to set aside a possession order and grant of relief from forfeiture (Still with us? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
 Here’s another inflammatory way to start out … would forcing boys to be vaccinated against their will but without any medical benefit to them, with the benefits accruing instead to girls, violate Roe v Wade? [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Dietary supplement claims must be substantiated by scientific evidence, the FDA has guidance for industry about this. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:11 am
Super. 1996) aff'd. 696 A.2d 1169 (Pa. 1997). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
Typical legal matters include:* incorporating nonprofit corporations* applying to the IRS for tax exempt status* drafting and negotiating contracts* providing legal advice to nonprofit board of directors and staff* drafting lending and real estate documents* assisting businesses with choice of entity decisionsThe Clinic will also offer a special tract involving policy development: At least four of the students in the Clinic will focus on assisting community groups develop local and statewide policy… [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:50 pm
V, c. 4, which forms a part of the constitution of Canada in virtue of the Schedule to the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c. 11. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:21 am
If you’re interested in finding out more, check out Weber v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:44 am by Tom
Such was the case in Commercial Interiors Corporation of Boca Raton v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
" 42 USC 2000e-16 includes the following employees and applicants: >military departments as defined in section 102 of Title 5 (i.e., The Department of the Army, The Department of the Navy and The Department of the Air Force) (this is referring to civilian employees - members of the military are specifically exempted in Section 7 of ENDA, also discussed below under subsection iii) >executive agencies as defined in section 105 of Title 5 (including employees and applicants for employment… [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 12:55 am
I'd like to thank Julian and the rest of the OJ team for asking me to participate here. [read post]