Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 4061 - 4080 of 112,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2017, 7:22 am by Docket Navigator
"A fixed physical presence in a district is not dispositive, and the guiding question is whether the corporate defendant does it business through a permanent and continuous presence in the district. . . . [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:49 am by Garret Murai
Earlier this year I filed a complaint in a court which I won’t identify other than to say that it wasn’t the San Francisco Superior Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 6:09 pm by Sanjana Hattotuwa
That the means through which information and communications are made secure is publicly known does not make the exchange of information any less secure. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:29 am by Scott R. Anderson
Indeed, at present, Trump does not appear to have memorialized whatever declassification decision he may have made in any meaningful outside way. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:03 am
The court does not credit the officer’s testimony because it was recollected only on the eve of the hearing on the motion to suppress over a year after the arrest. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:12 am by The Docket Navigator
Cir. 1997)] is to hold that the continued use of the sixty-eight [accused products] that were clearly sold prior to notice does not give rise to direct infringement. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
The Court does not read the plaintiffs' complaint as alleging that the defendants lacked prescience or that they should have recognized from the information available in the market that the Lehman bonds were over-valued. [read post]
4 May 2012, 4:30 am
  The Court remarked that although the courts resolve all ambiguity in favor of remand to state court, the ambiguous nature of plaintiff’s complaint does not prevent the court from determining the amount in controversy issue in defendant’s favor when the defendant has met its burden. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But the Court of Appeals does something that I have never seen before: it sends the case back to the district court to reconsider the sanctions because defendants' written submissions to that court were full of ad hominem, or personal, attacks "not relevant or helpful to the court's expeditious resolution of the dispute, which attacks necessarily augmented the fee demand. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:31 am by Mikhaila Fogel
As the Attorney General stated in his March 29th letter to Chairman Graham and Chairman Nadler, he does not believe the report should be released “in serial or piecemeal fashion. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:46 am by The Docket Navigator
In fact, Texas law provides that '[t]he forfeiture of the right to transact business in [Texas] does not . . . prevent the limited partnership from defending an action, suit, or proceeding' . . . [read post]