Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 4,484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
She found that: 1. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 10:31 pm
“Looking at the case in this light, it is apparent that Dastar does not permit Baden to claim false advertising under section 43(a)(1)(A). [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:19 pm
It analyzed the Section 43(a) issues in two stages, and concluded that “Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act does not create liability from Molten’s advertisements because those advertisements do not concern the ‘origin of goods,’ to which section 43(a)(1)(A) is directed, nor do they concern the ‘nature, characteristics, [or] qualities’ of the goods, which is what Ninth Circuit law has interpreted Section… [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:30 am
Hint: just because you can figure out the date of the quote, does not mean the president at that time wrote it. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:29 am
Regrettably, the Government's piecemeal approach to the removal of Government-unique restrictions has been disappointing and arguably does much less to "lure" commercial contractors into the federal marketplace than many in Congress would have hoped in enacting prior commercial reforms. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
In the present case, it is surprising that the Court founds its decision on the scope of Article 1(2)(d) on paragraph 35 of the Kerameus and Evrigenis Report, without acknowledging that that paragraph has been the subject of scrutiny and strong adverse comment by Advocate General Darmon in his Opinion in Marc Rich (paragraphs 43 to 48). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
Danek Medical, Inc., 43 F. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:53 am
[Image: Car vs. motorcycle accident in Pisek, Czech Republic, February 1, 2008, by Chmee2] [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:01 pm
" The court noted that Heartbrand does not identify any actual statement made by Yahoo. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
J Rehabil Med, Suppl., 43, 84-105. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
The restatement does not specify the seller’s role in the chain of distribution or the extent of a particular seller’s control over the product. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 8:35 am
Justice Stevens does it. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 10:40 pm
The fact that the numbers are low does not change the analysis [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
The restatement does not specify the seller’s role in the chain of distribution or the extent of a particular seller’s control over the product. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children collated the figures by issuing freedom of information requests to all 43 police forces in England and Wales. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
Whether an attempt should be made to bring forward DPD allocations (paragraph 43 of Circular 01/2006) may be the subject to debate but failure to do so does not, in my judgment, and in this particular context, render a decision to act under section 178 unlawful. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
Whether an attempt should be made to bring forward DPD allocations (paragraph 43 of Circular 01/2006) may be the subject to debate but failure to do so does not, in my judgment, and in this particular context, render a decision to act under section 178 unlawful. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:57 am
Chrysler does not deserve aid until it can present compelling new-generation vehicles. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 6:39 pm
If this does not catch President Obama's attention, I do not know what will. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:30 pm
And, CDC does a Podcast: [read post]
