Search for: "Edwards v State" Results 4061 - 4080 of 4,758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Israel English version of Israel patent database available (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office gears up for filing online (The IP Factor) Adjudicator of IP rules AMERICAN APPAREL lacks distinguishing features (The IP Factor) ‘Ein Gedi’ not acceptable as a word mark (The IP Factor) Japan Japan starts new patent prosecution highways with Austrian Patent Office and IP Office of Singapore (Managing Intellectual Property) Libya Libya cuts trade mark filing… [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
(Coverage by: No Fault Paradise; Edwards Angle Palmer & Dodge).Trentacoste v Riverhead Central School District, 2009 NY Slip Op 31112(U) (Sup. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 8:45 am by Anthony Zaller
In 2008, the California Supreme Court ruled on the enforceability of noncompetition agreements under California in Edwards v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Chris Dodd on Behalf of Senate HELP Chairman Edward Kennedy on June 9, 200906/09/2009 Fact Sheet: Key Features of the Tri-Committee Health Reform Draft Proposal (PDF 36 KB)Prepared by the Majority Staffs of the House Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means and Education and Labor Committees06/09/2009 Court Filing in the Matter of Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:06 am
StateCitation: 2009 WY 70Docket Number: S-08-0221Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, the Honorable Edward L. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 6:34 am
Examining Judge Sotomayor's years as a New York state prosecutor   Examining Judge Sotomayor's criminal justice record [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:52 am
”   Five years before Jackson, the Court had established another prophylactic rule in Edwards v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:18 am
Though Edward Wronko and Thomas Pavlinic argued that allowing them to recoup their fees out of the bail funds served the desirable purpose of providing criminal defense counsel at private expense, the Appellate Division, in State v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:39 am
The Court noted that it had created the presumption in Jackson by making an analogy to a similar prophylactic rule which the Court had established in Edwards v. [read post]