Search for: "Ex Parte Clear" Results 4061 - 4080 of 5,119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 10:30 am by Susan Brenner
X’s motion: a “regular response” and a “supplemental ex parte response. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Last week, Star Scientific’s ex parte patent reexaminations (90/009,372 & 90/009,375) were favorably terminated based upon responses filed in November of 2009. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm by Kim Zetter
(Friðrik Tryggvason/Wikimedia Commons) See also: Feds Subpoena Twitter Seeking Information on Ex-WikiLeaks Volunteers Eff, ACLU Challenge Feds WikiLeaks Twitter Probe [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:04 am by Ted Folkman
The only hint in the opinion is the remark that the plaintiffs may seek to proceed ex parte in some jurisdictions. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:01 am by Steve Lombardi
” There’s been a lawsuit filed between ISU and some ex-employees of the veterinary clinic. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:10 pm by Mike
 On December 3, 2010 TiVo sought inter partes reexamination of the '478 patent and ex partes reexamination of the other three patents. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 647 (2010) (certiorari granted on the issue of whether the presumption of validity associated with an issued patent must always be overcome with clear and convincing evidence);   ·       A challenge to the patentability of genetic material, See Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
There is, therefore, clear distinction between the two concepts. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by SOIssues
Some of the reasons behind that clearing have come to light, and have contributed to the growing unrest around her ex-husband, Prince Andrew. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Broader leeway for third-party submissions with explanations during ex parte patent prosecution. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:41 am by Stefanie Levine
One pointed out that the accused infringer could reargue its invalidity arguments, even if it lost at the PTO, since it had requested ex parte, not inter partes, reexamination, and therefore was not bound by the PTO's decision. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:41 am by Stefanie Levine
One pointed out that the accused infringer could reargue its invalidity arguments, even if it lost at the PTO, since it had requested ex parte, not inter partes, reexamination, and therefore was not bound by the PTO's decision. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am by Eric
The 106 rights are part of that, but all the defenses are an integral part too. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:17 pm by Steve Graham
  Are small-town prosecutors trying their best to curtail poaching, or are they part of the problem? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:29 pm by V.D.RAO
They can always plead in defence deficiencies on the part of the banks and financial institutions. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:14 pm by V.D.RAO
As it is considered that the Bank will take recourse to SARFAESI Act, 2002 to enforce the Secured Asset, the borrower may neglect the proceedings under the RDDB Act, 1993 and there can be some ex-parte issuance of Recovery Certificate and the Recovery Officer may initiate execution proceedings. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:06 pm by V.D.RAO
The compensation can not be limited to the issue of procedural lacunae on the part of the Bank in taking steps under the provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002. [read post]