Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 4061 - 4080 of 30,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2021, 1:46 pm by Clayton Perkins
Skepnek, of The Sader Law Firm, of Kansas City, Missouri, and Kevin Babbit, of Fagan & Emert, LLC, of Lawrence, Kansas won in State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Perhaps it is too much to expect fair-minded and accurate critiques from Demand Justice. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Dirk Auer
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
" To understand the meaning of going armed in a manner to terrorize, consider the facts in State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
I'm fairly confident that what Justice Robie says in this opinion about both the applicable law and the existence of prejudice accurately states the existing doctrine.But should it really be this way? [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
”  The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:14 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The balance here is strikingly parallel to what we saw in United States v. [read post]
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” That characterization ignored the ruling’s profound real-world effect, preventing 85%-90% of women from exercising their rights under Roe v. [read post]