Search for: "German v. German" Results 4061 - 4080 of 5,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
 For good measure, however, the court noted Quail Cruises Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:28 am
Last week the IPKat published a not inconsiderable and carefully reasoned rant, "Open Justice in Europe: IP Practitioners Speak Out" (here), in which it was reported: "There have been recent attempts to obtain Her Majesty's Government's (HMG)’s written observations in two IP reference cases, the UK “IP TRANSLATOR” case [see IPKat/Ashmead post here] on the use of class headings in trade mark applications/registrations, and the German patent… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
This outbreak has 15 cases versus more than 4,000 in the German outbreak. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
There have been recent attempts to obtain Her Majesty's Government's (HMG)’s written observations in two IP reference cases, the UK “IP TRANSLATOR” case [see IPKat/Ashmead post here] on the use of class headings in trade mark applications/registrations, and the German patent annulment case of Brüstle v Greenpeace which raises a question on the definition of the human embryo in Directive 98/44/EC on the legal protection of biotechnological… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:14 am by GuestPost
(For an interesting case on this issue, see the famous US Sixth Court of Appeals decision in Mozert v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
An additional forceful articulation of the right to privacy in American law is found in the 1967 Supreme Court decision in Katz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
It is well established that the courts are under a duty to construe domestic legislation which has been enacted to give effect to the UK’s obligations under the EU Treaty so as to give effect to those obligations (Pickstone v Freemans plc [1989] AC 66; Litster v Forth Dry Dock & Engineering Co Ltd [1990] 1 AC 546). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
The case involved 2 German-born brothers who had lived in the United States since childhood. [read post]