Search for: "Grant v. People"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 16,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2022, 5:05 am
That was the lineup in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
A closely watched case, Garcia v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
The court granted the motion on July 26, 2013. . . . [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
The Hollywood Reporter and Edward Lee at the Huffington Post discuss the grant of certiorari in the copyright restoration case Golan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:31 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
” The editorial board of The Washington Times encourages the Court to grant cert. in Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 4:58 am
Cavin v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:51 am
Here's her report — at the NPR website — on yesterday's oral argument in a case she doesn't mention the name of but which I happen to know is Schuette v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:16 am
After all, similar fictions were included in the phonebook that the Supreme Court found to lack originality in the leading case defining the limits of copyrightability for compilations, Feist v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 7:26 am
Stiles v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:14 pm
A current case that foreshadows this is the decision in Garcia v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Depriving people of intellectual and creative outlets can increase violent behavior and encourage people to act out. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 5:36 am
"... for anyone, including L.G.B.T.Q. people. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 4:55 pm
" (See People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:50 am
And for some people, this is the only time their names will ever appear in the paper. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:29 pm
The case, Villarreal v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:17 am
“So it’s going to be a much larger group of people who are denied access to the appeal. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
