Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Brady v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
A District Court in New York held that state law prohibiting certain class claims is not preempted by Fed. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:37 am
State Farm v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:28 am
Consistent with the Second, Sixth, and Eighth circuit courts’ holdings, the 7th Circuit held in Richardson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:27 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 2:36 pm
On June 26, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:05 pm
The First Circuit held that a distributor of child pornography may be ordered to pay restitution to the child victim portrayed in those images (United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:42 am
Louis University v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Dinnen v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Beard v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am
Five years ago, a divided Supreme Court held in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:18 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
(ii) The Strike Out Appeal In Summers v Fairclough Homes [2012] UKSC 26, Lord Clarke held that that the court has power to strike out a statement of claim on the ground that the claim is an abuse of the process of the court at any time. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:36 am
" It also states that "Lessors and Lessee agree that the holding in the case of Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:03 am
In its biggest patent decision since eBay v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court released a unanimous opinion in Groff v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
However, in Sky v SkyKick, the judge held that the EU Trade Mark Regulations (1994, 2009 and 2017) did not explicitly state that a lack of clarity and precision was a ground for invalidity of a registered trade mark, and the CJEU would have to provide guidance. [read post]
