Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 6,188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 11:29 am
In Byrne v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:12 am
The case, Dilbeck v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:37 pm
Williams, 59 N.J. 229, 233 (1971) (stating that when awarding counsel fees, “courts focus on several factors, including the wife’s need, the husband’s financial ability to pay and the wife’s good faith in instituting or defending the action”); Yueh v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
CORIOLAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:01 am
While that was the major issue in that case, there was another part of the case that jumped out at me, when I read this line related to the court's valuation of the husband's business and calculation: John also maintains that Judge Becker should not have accepted Dana's expert testimony with regard to the value of his business and the income it generates. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:16 am
DPW thereupon discontinued Wife’s MA-LTC due to excess resources. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 8:24 pm
The parties’ separation agreement, provided that the plaintiff husband would, among other things, make payments to the defendant wife for her support and maintenance and for the mortgage and carrying costs relating to the marital residence, where the defendant continued to reside. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 8:24 pm
The parties’ separation agreement, provided that the plaintiff husband would, among other things, make payments to the defendant wife for her support and maintenance and for the mortgage and carrying costs relating to the marital residence, where the defendant continued to reside. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:28 am
The trial judge awarded the home to the wife based on the husband's representation to the bankruptcy court that he had no interest in the property.The Appellate Division affirmed, noting: Judicial estoppel is intended to protect the integrity of the judicial process. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:40 am
The appellate court in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
Allen, Nos. 10-2160, 10-2161 (1st Cir. 01/06/2012), caused me to stop reading, go back, and re-read the paragraph:Frederick and Kimberlee Allen—husband and wife—appeal from their convictions for tax-related offenses. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
" "Not long ago, I introduced my fairly ordinary wife . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm
The Court imputed $122,300 to the husband and $45,000 to the wife for support purposes. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:00 pm
In 2007, providers at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in King’s Lynn put a Do Not Resuscitate order on Jean Hammond without her husband's knowledge. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
T.M.H., Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
The Court held that it would be the husband’s duty to raise and prove the affirmative defense of failure to mitigate. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:04 am
The husband sued the plan under ERISA to recoup this money. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
May v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 10:23 am
A police officer’s wife, also an officer, reported to the Chief that her husband was using steroids, and the department ordered a drug test. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
The Separation Agreement also provided for Petitioner's visitation rights as follows: The husband and wife may agree to any reasonable periods of visitation of the child by the husband at any time, subject to reasonable notice and final approval by the wife as to the location and length of such visitation. [read post]
