Search for: "Insurance Provider 2" Results 4061 - 4080 of 25,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
This ruling should provide some needed clarity in various contexts where the Transportation Act definition of “highway” is in issue. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:47 am
Yes. 11 NYCRR § 65-4.10(h) provides:(h) Appeal from master arbitrators award [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
”  Accordingly, Connecticut courts previously adopted the federal “Cigarette Rule,” which rule originally provided that a plaintiff prove that (1) the act or practice offends public policy as it has been established by statutes, the common law or other established concept of unfairness; (2) the act or practice is immoral, unethical, oppressive or unscrupulous; or (3) the act or practice causes substantial injury to consumers, competitors or other business… [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 2:05 pm by Christopher Simon
You do not want to give them an excuse not to defend and indemnify you. 2) All car insurance policies, even a minimum limits $25,000.00 policy, will provide you with a free lawyer in the event you are sued . 3) The insurance carrier will indemnify you up to the policy limits amount. [read post]
24 May 2019, 10:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Her clients include public and private health care providers, health insurers, health plans, technology and other vendors, and others. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
The opponent's motion seeking an order granting summary judgment pursuant to the Criminal Procedure Law and dismissing the victim's complaint on the grounds that the victim's injuries do not satisfy the serious injury threshold requirement of Insurance Law, and thus the complaint for non-economic loss is barred by Insurance Law is determined as provided. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 9:11 am by Retirement Blogger
Insurers provide the SBC for fully insured plans, but the plan sponsor (i.e. the employer) must provide the SBC for self-insured plans. [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:15 pm by Gary L. Britt, CPA, J.D.
Revenue Ruling 2009-11 provides that differential pay that employers pay to their employees that leave their job to go on active military duty is subject to income tax withholding, but is not subject to Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”) or Federal Unemployment Tax Act (“FUTA”) taxes. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:47 pm by Sheri Abrams
The website provides specific information on private and public programs for which you may be eligible. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:26 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As interpreted by the Tri-Agencies, except for excepted benefit arrangements as defined in the Rules, employers generally cannot pay for individual health coverage or offer or provide wrap around or other group health coverage to employees that enroll in individual coverage The Rules amend the definition of excepted benefits to include under very narrow specified conditions an employer to offer specified limited coverage that wraps around individual health insurance when the… [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm by skelly
The Opinion stated that based on the legislative history, the legislative purpose of the cancellation and non-renewal laws is to protect California consumers with respect to providing “advance notice of expiration, termination, cancellation and non-renewal of a policy of insurance leaving enough time to renew coverage or acquire other coverage. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:56 pm by Lauren Ellerman
Insurance company advocacy (to promote coverage)4. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:05 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Filed under: 105(h), Discrimination, Employee Benefits, Employers, ERISA, Health Plans, Human Resources, Insurance, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Tax Tagged: 105(h)(2), Affordable Care Act, Group Health plans, Health Care Reform, Health Insurance, Health Plans, medical insurance, Tax [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 3:06 pm
This would be one of the cheapest ways to immediately introduce new competition into the insurance business.2) Address issues of medical malpractice. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
” The insurer then filed this action seeking a declaration that its policy did not provide coverage because the insured had not purchased the requisite coverage. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:51 pm by Supreme People's Court Monitor
In CCDI hearing procedures, will evidence provided by the accused be considered? [read post]