Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 6,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio recently asked itself the same question (as the title to this article asks) in Wellington Resource Group LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
See, e.g., Larry Catá Backer, Emasculated Men, Effeminate Law in the United States, Zimbabwe and Malaysia. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:46 pm
Village of Hobart, Wisconsin (Clean Water Act, storm water)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmCases featured: Trazell v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm
But that panel's opinion today in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm
The United States Constitution, Article 5 states, “No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:44 am
”[1] School desegregation efforts across the United States have since been met with cultural, legal, political, and institutional resistance during the last sixty years. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
Keep an eye on the case of State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
They provide the normative and operational standard for the implementation of the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework for business and human rights structured around three pillars:[3]• The State duty to protect against human rights abuses by third parties, including business enterprises, through policies, regulation and adjudication. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:44 am
Here are the materials in Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:27 pm
” The Court also briefly expounded on what it meant by “land use restrictions,” stating that the Mitigation Fee Act would not apply to restrictions on the number of units a project can contain, or how large each unit can be, “or the validity of other use restrictions a local entity might impose. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 2:33 pm
Herne (jurisdiction)State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:10 pm
Posner, one of the most distinguished judges in the land and a member of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, saying he was mistaken in one of the most contentious issues in American politics and jurisprudence: laws that require people to show identification before they can vote. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:49 pm
Like Sotomayor, he expressed doubts about whether this case was any different from Washington v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:43 pm
[3] See Consent Decree, United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
Alliance Resources Corp., a punitive damage award of $10,000,000 in a West Virginia slander of title case was upheld by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:34 am
United States, No. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution addresses this important right. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:13 pm
United States (United States fiduciary duty)Akiachak Native Community v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The States and the People; Popular referendums. [read post]
