Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 45,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2022, 6:16 pm
Following the Supreme Court decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
The carport at issue is one that's familiar to anyone who's lived in cheaper apartments in our Great State: the carports consist of a line of open-ended stalls on the first floor of the apartment complex easily accessible to the street. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:52 am
On the upside, the NY bar exam is only two days long. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Katzburg comported with the protections the United States Supreme Court mandated in Turner v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
(Bell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 5:46 pm
Brown went back to prison to finish the 15 years.This week, in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:37 pm
That the primary thrust of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(c) is not to interdict speech, but rather conduct, is reinforced in State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:20 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm
From the majority opinion in Kindschy v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:54 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (the “Court of Appeals”) held in Santana-Díaz v. [read post]
1 Jun 2025, 5:15 am
A recent decision from the Arizona Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:46 pm
SEC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:17 pm
The California Supreme Court recently handed down a long awaited decision in the case of O'Neil v Crane Co. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 335. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
U.S.) as long as they remain nominally subordinate to the principal branches of government and as long as there is some (barely) intelligible principal (Whitman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Supreme Court ruled against Intel Corporation in, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
