Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 4061 - 4080 of 5,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 3:23 am by R. David Donoghue
P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and Rule 56 motion for summary judgment in this copyright and contract dispute involving photographs of Thomas & Friends characters - trains from the island of Sodor well-known to those like me with young children. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:47 pm by Eric E. Johnson
If silencing critics with lawsuits doesn’t work, then governing in accordance with the will of the electorate is the plan B. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
We put up an initial post about Bausch v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
App. 1997); [Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 924(b) (1979)]. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:39 pm by James Hamilton
No. 111-176, p. 152–153).Article IV of the protocol deals with the confidentiality of nonpublic information, personal data, and professional secrets. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
The memorandum goes on to spell out the ethical violation involved:Texas Disciplinary Rule 1.05(b)(3) provides that "a lawyer shall not knowingly: ... [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
The Court noted that the Supreme Court has held that entitlement to peremptory challenges is a matter of State law, and that there is no constitutional right to peremptory challenges. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:34 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Id. at p. 17, n. 4.In that same footnote, the Superior Court also stated, "We emphasize that we are not here deciding the propriety of the joinder of third party liability claims with post-Koken UIM benefit claims. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:34 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Id. at p. 17, n. 4.In that same footnote, the Superior Court also stated, "We emphasize that we are not here deciding the propriety of the joinder of third party liability claims with post-Koken UIM benefit claims." [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:22 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Enjoining Employers Pending Arbitration: Some Misconceptions and Clarifications William P. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:52 am by Joshua L. Cohen
Patent claims recite (a) “administering” a drug that provides a metabolite to a subject and (b) “determining” the level of the drug’s metabolites in the subject. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:33 am by Michael O'Hear
 I don’t think the government has nailed down how common (a) and (b) are. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by WSLL
§ 31-5-233(b) (LexisNexis 2007), and an administrative license suspension proceeding, as mandated by Wyo. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Kapnick in a case called Matter of Abraham (Elite Technology NY, Inc.), 2010 NY Slip Op 33225(U) (Sup Ct NY County Nov. 10, 2010). [read post]