Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 4061 - 4080
of 16,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
The shift toward greater content regulation marks a dramatic change in policy. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
This deference reached a high water mark in the late 1990s. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
The legislature found this to be a matter of statewide concern, affecting the general welfare of all employees, and the right to live wherever one wishes. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
The hearing proceeded to closing arguments following Defendant’s testimony and, at the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court took the matter under advisement. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
App. at 540, 648 S.E.2d at 864 (internal marks and citation omitted). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
Our trial courts are vested with broad discretion in child custody matters. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
MCMILLAN Opinion of the Court – 2 – summarize: “Their courtship was marked by relapses, hospitalizations, domestic violence and extremely careless behavior. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
The trial court asked Defendant’s trial counsel: “Up [until] the time that this matter occurred, Mr. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:40 am
San, LLC v Zucker & Kwestel, LLP, 112 AD3d 796, 797 [2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ginsburg Dev. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” At AP (via How Appealing), Mark Sherman reports that in G. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:32 pm
Don’t forget to insert your gum shields. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:45 am
And speaking of dates, you might also be wondering why this claim isn't barred by the statute of limitations, given that the alleged infringement took place 43 years before the filing of the lawsuit. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:37 pm
Plan of Greater N.Y.], 11 NY2d at 138 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 9:32 am
"Obscene" or "patently offensive" has the meaning specified in § 39-17-901 [which restates the First Amendment test for obscenity, and defines "patently offensive" as "that which goes substantially beyond customary limits of candor in describing or representing such matters," apparently referring to sexual matters. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
We don’t know the answers. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
” TMEP § 1202.08(b) (emphasis added by the Board).Applicant Madsen stated, without challenge by the examining attorney, that she has “provided at least seven different lectures for the educational services recited in this application with different subject matter for each lecture relating to the mark Predictive Entrepreneur. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 5:47 pm
The complaint is framed in the language of the whistleblower statute: The writer states that he believes that the president’s actions “constitute ‘a serious or flagrant problem, abuse, or violation of law or Executive order’ that ‘does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters,’ consistent with the definition of an ‘urgent concern’ in” the statute. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 1:38 pm
But no matter where you are, think of October as your do-over month, and the opportunity to plan for the remainder of the year. [read post]
