Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 4061 - 4080 of 16,980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am by Adam Chandler
The Hollywood Reporter and Edward Lee at the Huffington Post discuss the grant of certiorari in the copyright restoration case Golan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
” The editorial board of The Washington Times encourages the Court to grant cert. in Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court granted review in a free speech case, 303 Creative, et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Depriving people of intellectual and creative outlets can increase violent behavior and encourage people to act out. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
And for some people, this is the only time their names will ever appear in the paper. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:17 am
“So it’s going to be a much larger group of people who are denied access to the appeal. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:51 am
Here's her report — at the NPR website — on yesterday's oral argument in a case she doesn't mention the name of but which I happen to know is Schuette v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:16 am by Kit Walsh
After all, similar fictions were included in the phonebook that the Supreme Court found to lack originality in the leading case defining the limits of copyrightability for compilations, Feist v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:10 am by Laura Sandwell
However, judicial office holders who blog (or who post comments on other people’s blogs) must not identify themselves as members of the judiciary. [read post]