Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 15,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
This was especially true for his “language about the theoretical right of the sovereign people to interpose in the last resort,” Professor Fritz specifies. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
The recent case of People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 10:07 pm
It will also create a bit more confusion across political lines by further showing how an "activist court" can both produce Roe v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace e.V. -- the "what is an embryo? [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
The potential roadblocks -- her involvement in the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:48 pm
AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS, AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS V GREAT SOCIALIST PEOPLE’S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA, ORDER FOR PROVISIONAL MEASURES 25 MARCH 2011, by Eleni Polymenopoulou II. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
”[2] On January 26, 2024, the Court issued an Order indicating six provisional measures against Israel, including requiring it to “take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II of this Convention. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:17 pm
When a policy goal intersects with someone else's business model, you get an automatic power-up. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 10:20 pm
(See Diaz v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:12 am
In the case of Magner v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:56 am
People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:01 pm
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:15 pm
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 3:13 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 8:58 am
When considering a divorce, people move money around or even hide assets. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:28 am
The question in U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 2:27 pm
From Murphy v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
[1] Stephenson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
This made the recent spat between Chief Justice John Roberts and President Donald Trump over the role of partisanship in the federal judiciary all the more surprising and powerful. [read post]
