Search for: "People v. Render" Results 4061 - 4080 of 4,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by SHG
  Doudna wanted what so many people want from the internet, business. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:40 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
  But it is difficult to persuade council’s on this, especially when so many people locally are in the same boat. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 1:34 am
The paper at 88 JPTOS 743 included two footnotes of relevance:footnote 8: At some level, the use of the word "continuation" to mean more than one thing reminds one of Raffles v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:47 am
The IPKat's friends Marleen H.J. van den Horst and Jaap Bremer (BarentsKrans NV), who represented Stada in the Dutch proceedings, have kindly gone to the effort of rendering the District Court's decision into English and you can read it here. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
  The 3rd Circuit affirmed that in 2008, but last week the Supreme Court vacated that decision and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Smith v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:59 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Under Shared Parental Leave rules, people can take both types of leave, and usually do in practice — i.e., start adoption leave then switch into Shared Parental Leave. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Validity of Termination Clause Questioned in Wake of Termination of Employment The recent case of De Castro v Arista Homes Limited provides an excellent illustration of how termination clauses operate. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:40 am by SHG
  The solution to nuttiness isn't to shut down the people who point it out, but to not behave nutty. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:30 pm by James Rathz
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in FERC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:31 am by SHG
This comes from the Tennessee Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by M@jux-@dmin
Seq., people who are charged with indictable offenses (crimes of the first, second, third, or fourth degree) may be eligible for pretrial intervention (PTI). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:30 am by Clint Bolick
  The threat of judicial action, such as the specter of overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:02 am
  I think not, as he uses his point to question the Supreme Court's Scott v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:49 pm by Kevin
This question has been raised in United States v. [read post]