Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 4061 - 4080 of 5,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
“The Supreme Court exercises immense power to issue decisions that affect and bind all Americans,” Dellinger wrote. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
  In a 5-4 decision, the Court held the provision unconstitutional, with Justice Kennedy joining Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito in the majority. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The court in Jane Doe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by John Elwood
  Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, has already opined that “there is a strong likelihood that the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Scalia told us in Baze v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
” Each of the dissenting Justices filed a separate opinion: Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito (Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
The first Congress put that power to use by enacting the Patent Act of 1790. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
(For a recent reevaluation, see Thomas Colby's essay in Northwestern Law Review.)Taken in their own terms, the coercive Article Five exchange between Congress and the states does not establish the constitutional "quality" of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Rishi Ramnarain the defendant was charged with conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Stuart said he would show us how Chief Justice Roberts maneuvered, and many are praising him, saying that this is what John Marshall did in Marbury v Madison. [read post]