Search for: "S. C."
Results 4061 - 4080
of 142,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2024, 11:00 pm
Of course, C rejected that questionable, late-filed answer, and the AD2 agreed with the plaintiff and the court below that because JB had failed to demonstrate a timely response to the litigation a default judgment was appropriate.There’s no discharging that.# # #DECISIONC. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 7:30 am
Section 2(c) - Lack of Consent: Applicant Terminal Moraine contended that Mystery Ranch has no right to invoke Section 2(c) on behalf of Dana Gleason. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:10 am
With the 61 reforms to C-61 series now concluded, this post provides more accessible access to the many posts. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 18 November 2013 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 10:55 am
“What’s Wrong (and One Thing That’s Right) with an 11th Circuit Ruling Allowing a Florida School District’s ‘Biological Sex’ Restroom Policy”: Michael C. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 5:06 am
As I’ve chronicled for months, Bill C-18 is the product of an intense lobbying campaign from some of Canada’s largest media companies. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:48 am
This certainly wasn't the scenario Moore and the government envisioned when then Bill C-32 (which later became Bill C-11) was tabled. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:02 pm
Clearly, the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-95/04 P causes difficulty for the Commission's review of Article 82 EC enforcement. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:30 am
The S.E.C. is stepping up the pressure on Deloitte's Shanghai affiliate, which is resisting turning over records about accounting fraud at a Chinese company. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 5:02 pm
by MJIL [C. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 11:47 am
More than a year after the credit crisis first flared, Sheila C. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:30 am
See S. 2314, 105th Cong. (1998). [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:27 am
Simon’s working on an HBO treatment of Taylor Branch’s civil rights history. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:28 am
" The Board therefore found that Kate Middleton’s identity was of sufficient fame or reputation that when Applicant’s mark PRINCESS KATE and ROYAL KATE are used in connection with Applicant’s goods, a connection with Kate Middleton will be presumed.And so the Board found that both marks falsely suggested a connection with Kate Middleton, and it therefore affirmed the Section 2(a) refusal.Section 2(c): Section 2(a) of the Lanham act bars… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:08 am
¿Aún no estás suscrito(a) a Microjuris? [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 9:38 pm
Florida John C. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
So far, however, the IRS has not taken any action in response to the church’s activities..... [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 7:25 pm
In conclusion, the appeals panel found that C-Bar’s corporate form does not change the fact that Keiser-Long was so involved in C-Bar’s operations, she was akin to its alter ego and any loss to C-Bar was essentially her loss. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
§ 553 (c)(2)(C). [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:10 pm
-elect Larry Hogan’s inauguration on Jan. 21, both the new governor and transportation advocates for Baltimore’s Red Line, as well as for the Purple Line in Maryland’s D.C. suburbs, will face a moment of truth. [read post]
