Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, dissenting in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The court did recently have an opportunity, however, to demonstrate whether there is any daylight between its thinking and Scalia’s Heller opinion. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
In a development that has the potential to change the way private securities suits in the United States are litigated, the U.S. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Government Drone Overflights May Violate Fourth Amendment, Trigger Exclusionary Rule
27 Mar 2021, 12:59 pm
United States (2001), Justice Scalia [wrote]: … The present case involves officers on a public street engaged in more than naked-eye surveillance of a home. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
" United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm
While several of Kennedy’s tendencies have been discussed in the literature—such as viewing Lawrence in terms of “liberty” over “privacy,” or his preference for protecting human dignity, or his strong belief in federalism —this article, written in light of Kennedy’s crowning achievement, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:29 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:16 pm
Amplifying this argument is the provision of Twitter’s Term of Service that specifically requires that “You may use the Services only if you . . . are not a person barred from receiving services under the laws of the United States or other applicable jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
Purdue's relentless promotion of OxyContin itself caused tens of thousands of deaths, ruined many more lives, and played a key role in fueling the wider opioid epidemic that still bedevils individuals, families, and communities throughout the United States.After years of inaction, the United States brought civil and criminal charges against Purdue the company (but not the Sacklers), resulting in a guilty plea and a $2 billion forfeiture, but meanwhile, the Sacklers… [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 8:21 am
United States, in which the Supreme Court held that an airplane was not a vehicle under the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act.) [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Here's how Chief Justice Rehnquist accounted for this sort of mess in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
For instance, concurring in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am
Florida (10-1139), raising the issue of whether a state government interferes with foreign policy by barring state college professors from using any funds to visit Cuba or any other “terrorist state”; and Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:00 am
Nevertheless, as we now know, the Administration was quite willing to fire United States Attorneys who did not show themselves to be "loyal Bushies. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:27 am
United States may depend upon how the Court understands two words: “apportion” and “contribution. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:15 am
United States, 536 U. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Texas) and Citizens United v. [read post]
