Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 685 (1985). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:33 pm
A sharp and helpful reader discovered that Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts, whose work always captures my attention for various reasons, has today issued an interesting opinion in Richardson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:27 am
For a sharp contrast to the opinion by Judge Willie Fletcher that I lauded yesterday, read this opinion by Judge Bright (sitting by designation from the Eighth Circuit). [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Bradley King and Krisi Robertson in their official Governmental capacities as Co-directors of the Indiana Election Division, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
The majority analyzed a case from 1957, Hein v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:40 am
And Justice Klein states as much in a sharp, succinct, and crisp opinion.Good news for SLAPP jurisprudence. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:24 am
Herk's Tavern Inc., appellants
NEW YORK COUNTYTortsHusband Raises Triable Issues of Fact of Existence Of Marriage to Decedent to Maintain Derivative Claim Sharpe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:27 pm
The answer, in a word, is federalism, and the New Haven story is an interesting although unintended consequence of the 1997 decision in Printz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 5:44 am
My second case is Regina v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
Herk's Tavern Inc., appellants
NEW YORK COUNTYTortsHusband Raises Triable Issues of Fact of Existence Of Marriage to Decedent to Maintain Derivative Claim Sharpe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:28 am
Today I taught the famous 1919 case of Dodge v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:51 am
LaLiberte v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:56 am
The IPKat has recently spotted Target Fixings Ltd v Brutt Beteiligungsgesellschaft and others, a UK trade marks decision of Appointed Person Richard Arnold QC, Case O-372-06 from 20 December 2006. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 3:11 pm
As detailed in this post, last month I helped a team of sharp young lawyers develop and file this cert petition in US v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
E.g., Barnes v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:20 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeImpersonation, Tax Evasion Sentence Upheld; 'Sharp Practice' Not Due Process Violation United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
But a few of the things he talks about, one does feel qualified to comment on, and sometimes one finds himself in sharp disagreement.Oddly, some of the things Posner defends, at least in part, but that one disagrees with, are things that he is not guilty of. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 9:33 pm
In Sharp v. [read post]
